A: We have noted that the European Commission formally launched an anti-dumping investigation into "Pekin Duck" originating from China on July 9, and intends to use third-country prices as the basis for determining its normal value. Since its announcement, this investigation has attracted widespread attention and sparked divergent views across Europe.

As an agricultural food product bearing China's geographical indication characteristics, "Pekin Duck" is well-loved by consumers both in China and abroad, with its primary production and consumption markets located in China. The EU's decision to investigate it on the grounds of "dumping" runs counter to the shared understanding of consumers in China and Europe alike, and does not reflect the real experiences of those who enjoy it on the European market. This case reflects an inherent contradiction between the logic of "economic security" and the principle of "open trade." We believe that "Pekin Duck" is not only a delicacy enjoyed on dining tables, but also a reflection of the long-standing cultural exchanges, consumer ties and agricultural cooperation between China and Europe. It should not become a casualty of trade frictions.

The Chamber further points out that the EU's intention to use a third-country market as the price reference lacks reasonable justification, amounts to unfair treatment of "Pekin Duck," and calls into question the objectivity and fairness of the investigation.

We will continue to monitor the progress of this case and call on the EU side to handle this trade dispute in an objective, fair, and transparent manner, so as to avoid unnecessary disruptions to agricultural trade and the longstanding consumer and cultural ties between China and Europe.